Concepts · 3 min read

The Prisoner's Dilemma: Game Theory Basics With a Payoff Table

The Prisoner's Dilemma: Game Theory Basics With a Payoff Table — illustration
In short: Each prisoner does better by betraying whatever the other does, yet both betraying (2 and 2 years) is worse than both staying silent (1 and 1 year).

The payoff table (years in prison)

Other stays silentOther betrays
You stay silent1, 13, 0
You betray0, 32, 2

Lower is better. Each cell shows (your years, their years).

Best responses

If the other stays silent (C), your best reply is betray (0 year beats 1). If the other betrays (D), your best reply is betray (2 years beats 3). Betraying is best either way: a dominant strategy.

Nash equilibrium

When both players betray, neither can improve by changing alone. That stable outcome (2, 2) is the Nash equilibrium, even though (1, 1) would be better for both.

Why it matters

The same structure appears whenever individual incentives conflict with a shared benefit. Repeated games, reputation and enforcement can make cooperation rational. Compare with probability puzzles like Monty Hall.

Frequently asked questions

Is the dilemma realistic?

It is a simplified model. Real situations involve repetition, communication and enforcement that can change the outcome.

What is a dominant strategy?

One that is best for you no matter what the other player does.

Written and reviewed by Mateuss M.

Mateuss M. writes and reviews mathematical content for CalcSolver, focusing on online calculators, formulas, equations, and practical math tools. He reviews calculator functionality, calculation methods, formulas, examples, and explanations to help ensure that each tool is clear, useful, and easy to understand.

Keep reading